Skip to main content

Live Tides

All tide tools

NOTICES TO MARINERS

View all

Incident reporting

Life-threatening emergencies on the river:
Call 999 and ask for the Coastguard


For near miss, safety observations and incident reporting click below

 

Make a report
Consultations

New arch width restriction signage for bridges

Consultation C04-25

New arch width restriction signage for bridges
Consultation C04-25
PDF Download

1. Introduction

1.1. The purpose of this consultation is to seek views on a Port of London Authority (PLA) proposal for the introduction of new signage to indicate reduced widths in bridge arches. These signs are intended for use on bridges undergoing works that temporarily narrow the navigable width of an arch; while keeping it open to navigation. The signs will mark the area that remains safe for vessels to pass through. Although new to tidal Thames, these signs effectively used throughout Europe’s inland waterways and detailed in Annex 7, A.10 of the European Code for Inland Waterways (CEVNI).

1.2. The signage in this consultation will apply to all bridges within the Port of London Authority.
1.3. The full proposal is contained in ANNEX A of this consultation notice. 

2. The Consultation Process

Affected Parties
2.1. This consultation is directed towards river stakeholders and may be of particular interest to:
A. Masters and Pilots that regularly navigate the tidal Thames, particularly upriver of Tower Bridge.
B. Bridge owners and contractors that regularly undertake bridgeworks.

Consultation Duration
2.2. This consultation is now open and will last for 30 days. It will close on 09th October 2025.

Conclusion
2.3. The information you submit may be made available to other parties. If you do not consent to this, you must clearly request that your response be treated as confidential. Any confidentiality disclaimer generated by your IT system in e-mail responses will not be treated as such a request. If you make such a request, you will not receive a response.
2.4. We appreciate all responses to our consultations, and we may contact you to reply to your feedback, however we do not respond to everyone. Replies are provided when required – such as a request for more information.

3. Responses to this Consultation

3.1. Reponses to the consultation should be sent so that they are received no later than the closing date detailed in 2.2.
3.2. Responses may be submitted in the following two methods:

A. By post: 
Marine Compliance Department
Port of London Authority 
London River House, Royal Pier Road, 
Gravesend, Kent DA12 2BG

B. By email:
[email protected]
(Please include the Consultation Notice number in the subject line (located on the top right of the first page of this document – eg. CXX-2X).

4. Proposal

4.1. The PLA propose new signage to indicate reduced widths in bridge arches.
4.2. The new width restriction signage matches the provisions of: 
A. Signage information - Annex 7, A.10 of the European Code for Inland Waterways (CEVNI).
B. Technical specifications, including size and illumination - SIGNI European Code for Signs and Signals on Inland Waterways, Resolution 90.
4.3. The new width restriction signage would provide additional visual indication of where navigation is permitted. 
4.4. This signage would replace the unofficial tiger stripe/chevron boards that have been used in recent years.

APPENDIX A

NEW BRIDGE ARCH WIDTH RESTRICTION SIGNAGE 
The Port of London Authority (PLA) propose the introduction of new signage to indicate reduced widths in bridge arches. The signs are intended for use on bridges undergoing works that temporarily narrow the navigable width of an arch; while keeping it open to navigation. The signs will mark the area that remains safe for vessels to pass through. Although new to tidal Thames, these signs are based on those described in Annex 7, A.10 of the European Code for Inland Waterways (CEVNI).

The proposed signs are illustrated below, an apply only within the arch they are displayed.

By night, these signs would be illuminated by a white light, in line with the provisions set in SIGNI European Code for Signs and Signals on Inland Waterways, Resolution 90.

Vessels should only navigate in the area between the white markers (where two signs are displayed) or the area between the white marker and the furthest abutment (where one sign is displayed). Vessels must not navigate in the area between the red sector and the nearest bridge abutment, as indicated in the image below:

It should be noted that these signs will only be used where it has been assessed by the harbourmaster that works can be safely carried out with an arch remaining open to navigation. The signs would replace the tiger stipes that have been used over recent years. 

These new signs will offer mariners clearer visual guidance on the direction of width restrictions, marking an improvement over the previously used tiger stripe system. This initiative does not signal a reduction in the use of arch closures, which will continue to be implemented when necessary. All bridge works will remain subject to individual assessment, ensuring decisions are made on a case-by-case basis.

The PLA will seek to incorporate the new width restriction signs into the relevant port regulations

Consultations

Technical requirements for the issue of a certificate of compliance (Thames Byelaw 16)

Consultation C03-25

Technical requirements for the issue of a certificate of compliance (Thames Byelaw 16)
Consultation C03-25
PDF Download

1. Introduction

  • 1.1. The Port of London Authority is reviewing the Technical Requirements of the Issue of a Certificate of Compliance under Thames Byelaw 16. These certificates permit vessels to operate at higher speeds in designated areas of the tidal Thames, subject to strict safety and operational criteria.
  • 1.2. The purpose of this consultation is to seek the views on proposals for several modifications to Technical Requirements of the Issue of a Certificate of Compliance.
  • 1.3. This consultation applies to those involved high speed operations above Margaretness. 

2. The Consultation Process

Affected Parties
2.1. This consultation is directed towards current and prospective holders of a Certificate of Compliance and may be of particular interest to those who:
A. Operate high-speed passenger services
B. Operate high-speed RIB experiences
C. Engage in RIB training requiring planing activities. 

Consultation Duration
2.2. This consultation is now open and will last for 30 days. It will close on 09th October 2025.

Conclusion
2.3. The information you submit may be made available to other parties. If you do not consent to this, you must clearly request that your response be treated as confidential. Any confidentiality disclaimer generated by your IT system in e-mail responses will not be treated as such a request. If you make such a request, you will not receive a response.
2.4. We appreciate all responses to our consultations, and we may contact you to reply to your feedback, however we do not respond to everyone. Replies are provided when required – such as a request for more information.

3. Responses to this Consultation

3.1. Reponses to the consultation should be sent so that they are received no later than the closing date detailed in 2.2.
3.2. Responses may be submitted in the following two methods:

A. By post: 
Marine Compliance Department
Port of London Authority 
London River House, Royal Pier Road, 
Gravesend, Kent DA12 2BG

B. By email:
[email protected]
(Please include the Consultation Notice number in the subject line (located on the top right of the first page of this document – eg. CXX-2X).

4. Proposal

4.1. The following changes have been made when compared to the previous Technical Requirements of the Issue of a Certificate of Compliance.
A. Overall. Structural/layout changes
B. Overall. Removal of outdated references.
C. Section 1.3.3. SMS Audit Requirements. Footnote added to explain equivalent audit requirements for non ISM/DMSC vessels. 
D. Section 1.5.1. Additional Equipment. AIS carriage requirements updated from AIS A with persons on board capability to the AIS Carriage Requirements and POB reporting system. 
E. Section 1.7.1. Crew Qualifications reformatted into a table for clarity. 
F. Section 1.7.1. Further clarification on RYA qualification requirements, specifically the need for a commercial endorsement. 
G. Section 1.7. Crew Qualifications (previously 1.6e). Removal of provisions for small RIBs and Dory craft to navigate at high speed with a single person onboard. 
H. Section 1.9.1. Emergency Kill-cord. Terminology updated from “inflatable boats” to “open boats.” Acceptance of wireless kill-cords detailed due to updates in technology. 
I. Section 1.10. Night Navigation. Definition of open passenger vessels clarified and responsibility for training needs elaborated. 
J. Section 1.11. Navigation outside the authorised channel. New section added. 
K. Section 2.1. Initial Issue of a Certificate of Compliance. Additional need to provide vessel wash curves and/or undergo an assessment of the wash generation characteristics of a vessel.
L. Section 3.2. Annual Certificate of Compliance Renewal. Additional ability for the harbourmaster to review and/or request vessel wash curves and/or assessments of the wash generation characteristics of a vessel
M. Section 4.3. “For Cause” Wash assessment provision added

Statement
04/09/2025

PLA leading response to clean spill of bitumen

“On 17 August, FM Conway, a commercial operator working from Imperial Wharf in Gravesend accidently released bitumen – an oil product used in construction projects and to pave roads – into the River Thames. Since then, the Port of London Authority has been using its expertise to coordinate the clean-up operation working with partners across the region. So far, we have removed around 15 tonnes of bitumen from the River Thames. We will continue our efforts to search for, contain, and remove the spill.  

“If people find what they suspect to be bitumen, please don’t try to remove it yourself but report it to your local council. Our expert contractors advise that it is not harmful to human health, but it requires proper handling and disposal to avoid further contamination. The Environment Agency will lead the investigation into the cause of this incident.”

People of the Thames
03/09/2025

Merchant Navy Medal: Recognition of PLA Pilot Hywel Pugh

Image
Hywel Pugh on board a vessel on the Thames

We are proud to celebrate Hywel Pugh, who is one of just twelve recipients of the prestigious Merchant Navy Medal. The medal, one of the highest awards in the UK maritime sector, is presented each Merchant Navy Day to recognise individuals who go above and beyond in their service to the industry.

Hywel’s award highlights his outstanding contribution to training and supporting pilots on the Thames, as well as his tireless work across the sector to improve safety standards, particularly in relation to pilot ladders. 

We sat down with him to hear more about his career journey, his passion for training, and his commitment to safety.

Career Journey

Q: Can you tell us a little about your career in the maritime industry and then how you came to join the PLA?
I joined Houlder Brothers, a British Shipping company, at the age of 17 in 1978. I did a four-year Deck Cadetship, sailing on various ships around the world. On finishing my Cadetship, work was difficult to find as the British shipping industry was going through difficult times. Eventually, in the spring of 1983, I found employment with Crescent Shipping, a British company based out of Rochester, operating small coasters, known fondly as the "Turkish Navy" as they had a red crescent on the funnel.

In early 1989 I moved into the Offshore Industry in the North Sea, firstly onto Anchor/Platform Supply vessels, then onto a Semi-submersible Flotel, where I served as Master and Offshore Installation Manager. It was from here that I joined the PLA as a Trainee Pilot in September 1999.

Q: What have been some of the highlights or defining moments of your career so far?
Piloting the HMM Algeciras, a Megmax ULCS and at the time the largest container ship in the world, on her maiden voyage into London Gateway in the summer of 2020. A great deal of planning had gone into this visit and all of this under lockdown rules, so it was challenging for all.

Q: Who or what inspired you to pursue this career path? 
Since my coasting days with Crescent Shipping, piloting always appealed to me, but when I went to work offshore in the oil industry it went out of my mind. It wasn’t until 1998, while working in the Mexican oil fields in the Gulf of Mexico and wanting to be closer to home with a young family and a distant family network, that I decided to cast my eyes on some shore jobs.

I still have my Pilotage Exemption Certificate dated 1 October 1988, and one for the Medway. I was very fortunate to work with some great people over the years, and it is difficult to single any one person out.

A nine-to-five job has never appealed to me at all, so becoming a pilot, being home and also getting to play with other people’s toys without the paperwork was, and still is, the best job in the world.

Training and Supporting Pilots

Q: You’ve been recognised for your work in training and supporting pilots - what does that part of your role involve? 
I work in the simulator as an operator and trainer with the rest of the Simulator team. With the trainee pilots this is a hands-on role, as you instil in them good working practices and the safety aspects of piloting on the Thames. With pilot progression and ongoing refresher training, I see myself as a facilitator to their progression.

We are always looking to refine the sessions to assist the pilots in reaching their potential. Working in the simulator has made me a better pilot as I have become reflective in how I do my job on the river, then utilise these reflections to assist others. We are all different and sometimes it isn’t a one-team solution, so adaptation and understanding people is a great part of my role as a trainer — giving them tools to assist in completion of the tasks and exercises which they can take out on to the river and use in the day job.

We always use training as a positive motivator and a smiling candidate at the end of the session is the goal. I also look for progress as the session moves from the first to the last exercise.

I am also a member of the Pilotage Training Panel and spend some time doing revision sessions for the trainees during their exam phase — I enjoy doing these sessions.

Q: What do you find most rewarding about mentoring and training new pilots? 
The six months training is very tough both physically and mentally and on a successful pass and progression to authorisation, the smile on their faces is priceless. For the progression pilots, the conversation when they qualify as Unrestricted Class 1 Pilots — it gives me great pride that they have achieved their potential.

Q: How do you think pilot training has changed over the years, and what improvements are still needed? 
When I started, we didn’t have the in-house simulator or the reviewing system we have now, so it was very much “off you go and see you in six months for the exams.” We have come a long way in changing that with the systems we now have in place.
Technology has moved on and we sometimes struggle to keep up with this, but we must not forget the core skills of piloting such as looking out of the window and using the traditional tools such as radar.

This year we rolled out an in-house Master/Pilot exchange of information course, which has been well received by the pilot body, so we need to continue looking at these soft skill areas.

Safety and Pilot Ladders

Q: Safety is clearly a passion of yours — what first motivated you to focus on improving safety standards? 
I came from a background in the oil industry which, post Piper Alpha disaster, had become very focussed on health and safety — so it was natural for me to continue in this mode.

Q: You’ve done extensive work around pilot ladder safety. For those who may not know, why are pilot ladders so critical, and what risks do they pose if not used properly? 
Pilot ladders are the way we access the ship when it is underway. Regulation is international and it has taken many years to improve these regulations, which govern how this rope ladder with wooden steps is constructed, maintained and rigged by the ship’s crew.

The latest set of international regulations have just been passed and will come into force in 2028, but we are hoping for early adoption by many flag states. An unsafe ladder can kill you and, unfortunately, we do see fatalities every year.

In October 2020, while climbing the side of a ship, I had one of the side ropes on a ladder part on me, so I was left dangling on one side of the ladder. Fortunately, I survived to tell my tale, others don’t.

Q: Can you tell us about the specific work you’ve done in this area — and how it’s made a difference across the wider industry? 
I recently stepped down as Chairman of the UK Marine Pilots Association, and it was through this organisation, CHIRP, and our membership of the International Marine Pilots Association that we helped lobby the industry for changes. It has been a tough battle over the years.

The UKMPA reporting app was a game-changer as it allowed us to gather information nationally. It was adopted by the ports industry and thus gave the industry some teeth to challenge the MCA to support the proposed change. As Chairman, a great deal of time has been spent on this over the years.

Q: What challenges still exist around pilot ladder safety, and what changes would you like to see in the future? 
We already empower my colleagues to say no to unsafe arrangements, but some still use them. We need to understand why and work on getting the message to these colleagues that they should be saying no. The Board and ExCo are very supportive when a pilot says no.

The Award

Q: How did you feel when you found out you’d been awarded the Merchant Navy Medal? 
Very humbled and honoured that my colleagues and peers had nominated me for the MNM. It did take me a few days to process the nomination.

Q: What does receiving this recognition mean to you personally and professionally? 
A great honour and a team award, as I have been privileged to be surrounded by great colleagues and a supportive employer who have allowed me to do the activities outside my core pilotage job.

Q: What message would you like colleagues - especially newer pilots - to take away from your work and this recognition? 
If you have a passion then pursue it. For me this was to improve the standards in safety and training in pilotage, and I have been privileged to do that locally and nationally. So get involved locally and nationally, as they are always looking for volunteers.

Marine Pilotage Manager, Dave Newbury said: 

“Hywel’s dedication to pilot training and safety has not only shaped the careers of countless pilots on the Thames but has also influenced standards across the wider maritime industry. His Merchant Navy Medal is a fitting recognition of a career devoted to improving safety, sharing knowledge, and supporting others.” 

Clone of Port of London Authority

News
20/08/2025

Port of London launches new trade report

Image
Blue background with text quarterly trade report 2025 - quarter 2 written on top

The Port of London Authority (PLA) has launched the first of a new quarterly trade report – capturing and presenting key trading data showing activity through the UK’s biggest port. 

Between them, the 70 terminals within the Port of London handle around 1million tonnes of shipments every week and, for the first time, the PLA will report, by quarter, to show trends within that. 

This quarter (April-June 2025) happened to see the highest quarterly tonnage for five years, with 14m tonnes moving through the port. The vast majority of this is made up of imports (11.4m tonnes), which grew by 7% this quarter. However, exports grew markedly this quarter by 42%, up to 2.9m tonnes.

Unitised cargo – container shipments – made up the biggest form of trade, accounting for 51% of all tonnage through the port, followed by oils and then aggregates (building and construction materials). 

There was a reduction in trading of steel this quarter but, following a strong first quarter, tonnage of steel through the port is 13% higher than at this point last year. 

Commenting on the new quarterly trade report, Steve Lockwood, Chief Financial Officer at the Port of London Authority, said:

 “The country’s growth goes hand in hand with the growth of business through the Port of London.  That is because ports are the front line for growth, bringing in fuels, building materials and goods, and opening up access to and from markets around the world.   

“As the UK’s biggest port, responsible for more than 50m tonnes of cargo each year, the Port of London and our customers are essential for turning ambitions for growth into a reality.   

“We will continue to support our customers and enable their growth by investing to make the Port of London the best place to trade, enabling and encouraging our customers to innovate - including around decarbonisation, and by backing our customers in exploring business opportunities in the tidal Thames.”

Read the report

Publications

Quarterly Trade Report

Quarterly Trade Report
Q2 of 2025
PDF Download
Image
Blue background with text quarterly trade report 2025 - quarter 2 written on top

QUARTERLY TRADE REPORT 2025 – QUARTER 2

SUMMARY

Overall cargo tonnage has increased 6.2% this quarter from the previous quarter. This is in line with the seasonality of previous years which typically show a significant increase in tonnage between Q1 and Q2. 

This was true for most cargo types however oil tonnage was flat from Q1 and remains 4.5% below this time last year. Aggregate tonnage increased this quarter but is still 6.8% lower than last year. 

After a high Q1 steel had a correspondingly low Q2 but remains 13% up on this time last year. Vegetable oils and other goods had a strong Q2 and are significantly up on last year. This quarter is the highest recorded quarterly tonnage in the last five years and shows that even accounting for the Houthi Rebel affected volumes last year, tonnage for the port is significantly up on 2024. This has been primarily driven by a large increase in container tonnage at our largest terminals.

 

Publications

Cable Statement

PDF Download

Overview

The river Thames is home to the Port of London which is the country’s biggest port handling over 50 million tonnes of freight each year. 

The Port plays an essential role in the UK and global economies and in the sustainable transport of cargo and people. It is critical therefore that the existing and future capacity and operation of the Port are safeguarded and that proposed developments are appropriately designed, implemented, operated, maintained and decommissioned to ensure that constraints are not placed on the existing or future functioning of the Port. 

The Port of London Authority (PLA) is the statutory harbour authority for the tidal Thames. Its consent is required for all works within its area of jurisdiction. The PLA’s functions include the promotion of the use of the river for freight and passengers as an important international gateway and sustainable transport corridor. 

The PLA recognises the need for energy projects such as windfarms and interconnectors. A number of these projects are currently proposed in the Thames Estuary reflecting available onshore connection points and the need to transport electricity within the UK and between the UK and Europe. The PLA have the primary responsibility for maintaining safe access and managing the safety of vessels, the general public and all users of the tidal River Thames. 

The PLA will work proactively with developers and stakeholders including the ports and terminals within the Port of London to enable these projects to be delivered wherever possible, whilst at all times ensuring navigational safety is maintained; ensuring that the Port of London can continue to grow and remain the largest port in the Country; and supporting the Port’s transition to net zero. 

Anyone considering placing cables within the Thames Estuary either within or outside its area of jurisdiction should contact the PLA at the earliest opportunity to discuss the PLA’s requirements. This cable statement sets out the broad issues that must be considered by developers and the documents and mitigation that the PLA would expect to see as a minimum within applications.

Cable Route

The PLA will provide advice on the route for the proposed cable and in particular any areas that must be avoided. This will include navigation channels and pilot boarding areas, where depths for current and future vessels need to be protected and any temporary disruption to navigation minimised. 

Projects should avoid placing cables within navigation channels. If cables must cross a navigation channel, the shortest route should be taken i.e. at 90 degrees to the channel. 

Cables must not be placed in a navigation channel following the route of the channel.

If a cable is to be located outside of a navigation channel, the PLA will provide the distance the cable must be placed as a minimum from the channel, taking into account the potential for the channel to migrate and the need for the channel to be widened in the future.

 Along the route of the cable, the need for a planned cable field joint in or close to the navigation channel must be avoided.

Cable depth

Along the route of the cable, the PLA will provide details on the riverbed level(s) that will need to be maintained over the lifetime of the project. These level(s) will be provided with reference to Chart Datum (equating roughly to the level of lowest astronomical tide) and might be different to the existing riverbed levels reflecting:

  • Current and future vessel sizes

  • Existing and proposed dredging

  • Changes to the bed of the river (migration of the channel)

The developer will need to carry out an assessment to determine the distance that any cables need to be placed under the given riverbed level(s).  The cables will need to be designed, installed, operated and maintained so as not to preclude or impede the provided riverbed levels(s).   For any Development Consent Order (DCO) projects, the PLA would expect a Requirement in the DCO linked to a Certified Plan that secures the required riverbed level(s). This Requirement should also be included in any Deemed Marine Licence.

A remediation clause must clearly set out the measures that will be taken if, during installation of maintenance of the cable, the cable is not installed at the correct depth.  This should include attempts at re-burial and if not successful, removal of the cable. The PLA also expects to be indemnified by the developer for any impacts of the cable.

Cable Crossings and Cable Protection

Cable crossings and cable protection both have the potential to reduce navigable depths and whilst the Maritime and Coastguard Agency generally accept reductions in navigable depth of up to 5% Chart Datum, where the PLA has provided details on the riverbed level(s) that will need to be maintained over the lifetime of the project, the PLA will not accept any reductions in water depth in these location(s). 

When designing a project, other emerging projects should be considered and the likely location(s) of any cable crossing(s). Projects should be designed not to prejudice other emerging projects from coming forward for example, it might be necessary for a project to install its cable at a greater distance under the riverbed to enable an emerging project to cross it and still maintain the required riverbed level. 

Cable crossings and cable protection should be located outside of navigation channels and away from any pilot boarding stations. Where a cable becomes exposed or depth of burial is significantly reduced, attempts must be made to re-bury the cable to the required depth.

Pre Construction and Construction Activities

Pre-construction and construction activities have the potential to impact on shipping and navigation. 

The PLA would expect to be consulted and for its comments to be taken into account when any pre-construction surveys or monitoring is proposed. Any surveys or monitoring undertaken within the PLA’s area of jurisdiction will require its statutory consent under the Port of London Act 1968 (as amended). 

To mitigate and manage pre-construction and construction activities key documents should be produced. These documents must be clear in their scope, applying to both installation and maintenance. Final versions of documents must be produced in strict accordance with any outline versions of the documents. The documents should be clear on the procedure should any updates be required to the documents during the lifetime of the project. 

Examples of these documents can be provided on request. 

Navigation and Installation Plan (NIP) This document is a mechanism for managing working, including concurrent working within any areas of navigational interest. Following, consultation with the PLA the document must set out the ‘area of interest’ and provide details on the activities and associated restricted in ability to manoeuvre (RAM) vessels used for those activities. It must set out which concurrent activities are possible and which are not possible and must give indicative details including duration, spatial extent, speed when undertaking activity, whether it is a continuous or discontinuous activity etc. Planned protocols and actions which will be implemented must also be provided. 

Cable Specification and Installation Plan (CSIP) This document must set out the activities that need to take place in order to install and maintain the cable and the commitments relevant to those activities. It should include as a minimum, details and commitments relating to pre-construction surveys, riverbed preparation, unexploded ordinance (UXO) clearance, boulder clearance, archaeology, pre lay works (e.g pre-lay grapnel run, sandwave clearance), sediment disposal, cable installation, cable jointing, cable protection, cable crossings, cable burial and monitoring, including any post-construction surveys. 

The document must meet the requirements set out above in relation to the cable (route, depth, crossings, protection etc) and commit to not relocating to or within navigation channels any boulders, archaeological finds or UXO and to no wet storage within navigation channels. 

Sediment Disposal Management Plan (SDMP) This document sets out the proposed plan and management for the disposal of riverbed and other relevant material (e.g sub-bottom geological material) that might be generated during the construction and maintenance of the project. This document must clearly set out the approach to disposal at any navigation channels and in proximity to boarding and landing areas and must clearly commit to not placing material where deeper cable burial is required (i.e. where the PLA has provided a riverbed level that must be safeguarded which is deeper than existing bed level) and in proximity to pilotage boarding areas.

If produced pursuant to a DCO, the PLA would expect to secure approval of the final documents in its protective provisions. Otherwise they will form a condition on the RWL.

Decommissioning

The PLA understand that energy projects can have long life spans and that it may also be possible to extend a projects expected life span.  It may therefore not be possible when designing a project to make clear commitments relating to the projects de-commissioning. However, there must be a clear mechanism for securing a decommissioning plan with input from relevant stakeholders at the appropriate time.

Protective Provisions

For DCO applications, regardless of whether a project is located within or outside of the PLA’s area of jurisdiction, the PLA expects protective provisions to be provided for the PLA.  A copy of model protective provisions can be provided on request.

Environmental Considerations

For all proposals, the potential for significant environmental effects must be considered. 

Where there is the potential for the installation and/or operation of the cable to adversely affect a European designated site (Special Area of Conservation, Special Protection Area and/or Ramsar), a Habitats Regulations Assessment is required under the Conservation of Habitats & Species Regulations 2017 (as amended). This should follow Government guidance. Sufficient information should be provided by the applicant to allow the Competent Authority to carry out the assessment, a shadow HRA can be submitted for approval and adoption by the Competent Authority.

Cabling projects may require an Environmental Impact Assessment, under either the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, the Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007, or the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017. Projects should be screened to determine whether an EIA is required, and a screening report submitted to the appropriate regulator. If an EIA is deemed to be required, this should follow the relevant process and guidance and an Environmental Statement prepared assessing the environmental impacts and identifying avoidance, mitigation and/or compensation measures. 

A Water Framework Directive (WFD) Assessment should be carried out in accordance with the Water Environment (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Regulations 2017 and following Government guidance. This should assess the potential effects on the relevant waterbody.

News
11/08/2025

First mass wet wipe removal from a UK river launched to clean London’s ‘Wet Wipe Island’

Image
Wet wipe island at Hammersmith
  • 180 tonnes of congealed wet wipes – the equivalent to the weight of 15 double decker London buses – are being removed from the River Thames by the Port of London Authority, with support from Thames Water  
  • The month-long operation is the country’s first mass wet wipe removal project of its kind
  • Environmental charity Thames21 and its volunteers have already collected more than 140,000 wet wipes along the Thames and campaigned to clean up the site

Work has started on the mass excavation of London’s Wet Wipe Island in a first-of-its-kind river clean-up project to further improve the quality of the River Thames.

Led and co-ordinated by the Port of London Authority with collaboration from Thames Water, the operation is removing an estimated 180 tonnes of congealed wet wipes that has formed the island along a 250-metre stretch of the tidal Thames near Hammersmith Bridge. It is expected to take up to a month to complete.

The island, which is about the size of two tennis courts, has changed the course of the river and potentially harmed the aquatic wildlife and ecology in the area.  

To date, efforts to clean wet wipes from this unique natural environment have relied on people removing them by hand. Inspired by the work of volunteers at Thames 21, the PLA decided to take a lead in co-ordinating larger scale action to remove this unsightly and harmful mess.

The UK’s biggest port, which is responsible for protecting and improving the tidal Thames, commissioned an independent ecological study of the site. This helped inform and develop an environmentally responsible plan to use a mechanical excavator to remove the wet wipes on a mass scale.

Thames21 and its volunteers have been monitoring the island since 2017. Their data and research have played a vital role in raising awareness of how wet wipes containing plastic can degrade the environment and harm wildlife. Their data has also influenced Government policy. It comes after the Government recently published draft legislation to ban wet wipes containing plastic.  

Thames 21’s work, alongside expert insights from the PLA’s own hydrography and environmental teams, has proved invaluable in planning the mass removal project.

St Paul’s School, Barnes is supporting the clean-up and giving access to its grounds to allow the eight-tonne excavator to carefully remove the ‘island’ – which is 1m high in places – from the foreshore when the tide is low. The wet wipes and other pollutants will then be taken away in skips and responsibly disposed of.  

This project is part of an ambition to improve river health in the Thames. The PLA’s Clean Thames Manifesto coordinates action across a number of stakeholders towards a clean, pollution free river with a healthy ecosystem by 2050.  

Thames Water recently announced a further £1.8billion investment to improve river health across London, and last year connected its £4.6 billion Thames Tideway Tunnel to support the reduction of sewage discharges into the tidal Thames by 95%.

Wet wipe on the foreshore

Port of London Authority’s Director of Sustainability, Grace Rawnsley, said:

“For too long, ‘Wet Wipe Island’ in Hammersmith has been a source of environmental harm and an embarrassment to the capital. Inspired by the work of volunteers at Thames 21, we decided to take a lead in co-ordinating action to remove this unsightly and harmful mess.

“This is the first time anyone has sought to execute a mass, mechanical removal of wet wipes in this way.  

“We want a cleaner, healthier tidal Thames and will continue to work with all interested parties to secure that. And we will continue to bring innovation and investment to help the world’s greatest river thrive.”

Thames Water’s Head of Tideway Integration Group, John Sullivan, said:

“Our purpose is to deliver life's essential service, so our customers, communities and the environment can thrive.  We are pleased to collaborate with the PLA and Thames21 to remove this mass of wet wipes. For us it is a visible reminder of the damage caused by putting the wrong things down the toilet because flushing something non-biodegradable like a wet wipe doesn’t just make it disappear.  

“Blockages caused by wipes are a leading cause of pollution and we remove an estimated 3.8 billion wipes from our network each year.

“We all have a role to play in ensuring that people can enjoy our rivers.  Over the next five years Thames Water is targeting a record £9.5 billion (in 2022/23 prices) of investment across our wastewater assets to meet the demands that come with population growth and climate change.”  

Chris Coode, CEO at Thames21, said:Graphic showcasing wet wipes collected by Thames21

“Plastic wet wipes have no place in our rivers or natural environment, so it’s terrific news that action is being taken to remove wet wipe island in the Thames.

“This vital move is a crucial step towards protecting the health of the River Thames and its wildlife, as it will reduce the introduction of microplastics into the environment from this site.  

“Thames21 and its dedicated volunteers have been building evidence for eight years. We want to give our volunteers a huge shout-out for their persistence. This has been a massive piece of work!

“Thames21 has been pushing for a ban on plastics in wet wipes. However, we would like to see more systemic change to tackle the issue of plastics entering the environment via wet wipes and other sanitary waste.

“We want producers to get serious about plastic-free alternatives to wet wipes. We ask water companies to increase their investment in screening to prevent wet wipes and other sanitary waste which contains plastic entering the environment. We’d also like to see a step-change in their investments in upgrading sewage infrastructure to prevent overflows. We’d like to remind people to bin their sanitary waste and wet wipes, not flush them down the toilet, so that they don’t enter our wastewater system.  

“By working together, we can achieve great things for rivers, wildlife and people. Let’s do it!”

Fleur Anderson, MP for Putney, Southfields, Roehampton and Wandsworth Town, said:

“This is a huge moment – after years of campaigning, wet wipe island hopefully is no more! It’s so long overdue and very welcome. There was a national outcry at this monstrosity in the Thames – caused by plastic wet wipes, which cause massive damage to our environment and our sewer systems.

“The ban I’ve introduced will mean 3.8 billion wipes removed from the network every year. A win for our waters, sewers and environment!” 

News
06/08/2025

PLA's new Trainee Marine Pilots

Image
Two new PLA Pilots in front of a Pilot Cutter who joined in July 2025

We’re thrilled to welcome Sathar Sulaiman and James Kitney to the PLA as they join us as Trainee Marine Pilots. Both bring extensive seafaring experience, strong leadership skills, and a shared passion for navigation and ship handling. 

The River Thames is one of the most complex and challenging pilotage environments in the world, and we’re confident they will thrive in their new roles. We wish them every success as they begin this exciting new chapter - good luck with your training, and welcome to the team!

Sathar Sulaiman

Originally from India, Sathar began his maritime career as a Deck Cadet, gaining a strong operational foundation on bulk carriers and container vessels. He went on to serve as an Officer of the Watch (OOW) on crude oil, product, and Type 1 & 2 chemical tankers, later progressing to the role of Chief Officer.

He holds a Bachelor of Science (BSc) in Nautical Science and completed his professional maritime training at City of Glasgow College, achieving both his Mates and Master’s certification, culminating in a Master’s Certificate of Competency.

Sathar’s interest in pilotage developed during his years at sea, where he found pilotage operations to be the most fascinating and challenging part of any voyage, particularly in complex or busy waterways. His decision to join the PLA was inspired by the opportunity to work on the River Thames, one of the world’s most historic and demanding tidal rivers.

He is excited to transition from life at sea to a shore-based role as a Marine Pilot, where he can continue applying his maritime experience while learning from the PLA’s highly skilled team of pilots.

Outside of work, Sathar enjoys acting, singing, playing competitive cricket during the English season, and travelling to places with rich maritime heritage or natural beauty. He also loves long drives and exploring new destinations.

James Kitney

Originally from Dover, James began his career as a Deck Cadet with P&O in 2000. Over the years, he has gained extensive experience working on ro-pax ferries, tugs, and cruise ships, spending the past 13 years in RoRo freight, where he achieved the rank of Master in 2014.

For James, becoming a Marine Pilot was the natural next step after his time as Master, building on over 15 years of experience handling vessels. He is looking forward to the variety and challenges of piloting different ship types on a daily basis and contributing his expertise to the PLA.

Outside of his professional life, James is a 2nd dan in DNBK Iaido, a form of Japanese swordsmanship recognised by the Dai Nippon Butoku Kai (Japan’s oldest martial arts organisation). He also enjoys archery, playing the drums, and taking part in local charity work.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Subscribe to

Essential information

Receive key updates

Subscribe Now
Back to top