Skip to main content

Live Tides

All tide tools

NOTICES TO MARINERS

View all

Incident reporting

Life-threatening emergencies on the river:
Call 999 and ask for the Coastguard


For near miss, safety observations and incident reporting click below

 

Make a report
Publications

Privacy policy

February 2024
PDF Download

Introduction

The Port of London Authority respects your privacy and is committed to protecting your personal data. This privacy policy will inform you as to how we look after your personal data and tell you about your privacy rights and how the law protects you.

1. Important information and who we are

Purpose of this privacy policy 

This privacy policy aims to give you information on how the Port of London Authority collects and processes your personal data, including any data you may provide. 

It is important that you read this privacy policy together with any other privacy policy or fair processing policy we may provide on specific occasions when we are collecting or processing personal data about you so that you are fully aware of how and why we are using your data. This privacy policy supplements other notices and privacy policies and is not intended to override them.  

This privacy policy applies to data collected by the Port of London Authority and its partner, Estuary Services Limited. 

Controller 

The Port of London Authority is the controller and responsible for your personal data (collectively referred to as "PLA", "we", "us" or "our" in this privacy policy). 

The PLA is a self-financing statutory body.  In simple terms, we generate income through our activities as a port and conservancy authority to enable us to carry out our statutory duties.  These are set out in the Port of London Act 1968 as Amended.  Our operations cover 95 miles of the tidal River Thames.  We work to keep commercial and leisure users safe, to protect and enhance the environment and to promote the use of the river for trade and travel. 

We have appointed a data protection officer (DPO) who is responsible for overseeing questions in relation to this privacy policy. If you have any questions about this privacy policy or our privacy practices, please contact the DPO using the details set out below.  

Contact details 

Full name of legal entity: The Port of London Authority, c/o the General Counsel 

Email address: [email protected]   

Postal address: The Port of London Authority, London River House, Royal Pier Road, Gravesend DA12 2BG 

You have the right to make a complaint at any time to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), the UK supervisory authority for data protection issues (www.ico.org.uk). We would, however, appreciate the chance to deal with your concerns before you approach the ICO so please contact us in the first instance.  

Changes to the privacy policy and your duty to inform us of changes 

We keep our privacy policy under regular review. This version was last updated on 6 October 2020.  

It is important that the personal data we hold about you is accurate and current. Please keep us informed if your personal data changes during your relationship with us. 

Third-party links 

This website may include links to third-party websites, plug-ins and applications. Clicking on those links or enabling those connections may allow third parties to collect or share data about you. We do not control these third-party websites and are not responsible for their privacy statements. When you leave our website, we encourage you to read the privacy policy of every website you visit. 

In particular, via our website, the PLA use YouTube API Services.  We refer you to YouTube’s Terms of Service (ToS) and the Privacy Notice of its parent company, Google, in the following links for further details: 

2. The data we may collect about you

Personal data, or personal information, means any information about an individual from which that person can be identified. It does not include data where the identity has been removed (anonymous data). 

We may collect, use, store and transfer different kinds of personal data about you which we have grouped together as follows: 

  • Identity Data includes first name, maiden name, last name, username or similar identifier, marital status, title, date of birth and gender. 
  • Contact Data includes billing address, delivery address, email address and telephone numbers. 
  • Financial Data includes bank account and payment card details. 
  • Transaction Data includes details about payments to and from you and other details of products and services related to relevant transactions. 
  • Technical Data includes internet protocol (IP) address, your login data, browser type and version, time zone setting and location, browser plug-in types and versions, operating system and platform, and other technology on the devices you use to access this website.  
  • Profile Data includes your username and password, your interests, preferences, feedback and survey responses.   
  • Usage Data includes information about how you use our website, products and services. 
  • Marketing and Communications Data includes your preferences in receiving marketing from us and our third parties and your communication preferences. 

We may also collect, use and share Aggregated Data such as statistical or demographic data for any purpose.  Aggregated Data could be derived from your personal data but is not considered personal data in law as this data will not directly or indirectly reveal your identity. For example, we may aggregate your Usage Data to calculate the percentage of users accessing a specific website feature. However, if we combine or connect Aggregated Data with your personal data so that it can directly or indirectly identify you, we treat the combined data as personal data which will be used in accordance with this privacy policy. 

We may also collect some Special Categories of Personal Data about you including details about your race or ethnicity, religious or philosophical beliefs, sexual orientation, political opinions, trade union membership, information about your health, and genetic and biometric data. We do not collect any information about criminal convictions and offences. 

If you fail to provide personal data 

Where we need to collect personal data by law, or under the terms of the agreement we have with you, and you fail to provide that data when requested, we may not be able to perform the agreement we have or are trying to enter into with you (for example, to provide you with goods or services or to licence works). In this case, we may have to cancel the agreement you have with us but we will notify you if this is the case at the time.  

3. How is your personal data collected?

We use different methods to collect data from and about you including through: 

  • Direct interactions. You may give us your Identity, Contact and Financial Data by filling in forms or by corresponding with us by post, phone, email or otherwise. This includes personal data you provide when you:
    • Make any application to us in our capacity as a port and conservancy authority;
    • apply for our products or services;
    • create an account on our website;
    • subscribe to our service or publications;
    • request marketing to be sent to you;
    • enter a competition, promotion or survey; or
    • give us feedback or contact us.
  • Automated technologies or interactions. As you interact with our website, we will automatically collect Technical Data about your equipment, browsing actions and patterns. We collect this personal data by using cookies, server logs and other similar technologies. We may also receive Technical Data about you if you visit other websites employing our cookies. Please see our cookie policy below for further details.
  • Third parties or publicly available sources. We may receive personal data about you from various third parties and public sources, including but not limited to, those set out below:
  • Contact, Financial and Transaction Data from providers of technical, payment and delivery services.
  • Identity and Contact Data from publicly available sources such as Companies House and the Electoral Register based inside the EU.

4. How we use your personal data

We will only use your personal data when the law allows us to. Most commonly, we will use your personal data in the following circumstances: 

  • Where we need to perform the agreement we are about to enter into or have entered into with you.
  • Where we need to carry out a task in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority vested in us.
  • Where it is necessary for our legitimate interests (or those of a third party) and your interests and fundamental rights do not override those interests.
  • Where we need to comply with a legal obligation.

To find out more information about the lawful bases upon which we will rely on to process your personal data, please refer to the Glossary below. 

Purposes for which we will use your personal data 

We have set out below, in a table format, a description of all the ways we plan to use your personal data, and which of the legal bases we rely on to do so. We have also identified what our legitimate interests are where appropriate. 

Note that we may process your personal data for more than one lawful ground depending on the specific purpose for which we are using your data. Please contact us if you need details about the specific legal ground we are relying on to process your personal data where more than one ground has been set out in the table below.  

chart showing purposes for which we will use your personal data

Marketing 
We may use your Identity, Contact, Technical, Usage and Profile Data to form a view on what we think you may want or need, or what may be of interest to you. This is how we decide which products, services and offers may be relevant for you (we call this marketing).  

You will receive marketing communications from us if you have requested information from us or entered into agreements with us and you have not opted out of receiving that marketing. 

Third-party marketing 

We will get your express opt-in consent before we share your personal data with any third party for marketing purposes.  

Opting out 

You can ask us or third parties to stop sending you marketing messages at any time by contacting us or them at any time.  

Cookies 

You can set your browser to refuse all or some browser cookies, or to alert you when websites set or access cookies. If you disable or refuse cookies, please note that some parts of this website may become inaccessible or not function properly. For more information about the cookies we use, please click on the following link  http://www.pla.co.uk/Privacy-and-Cookies-Policy   

Change of purpose 

We will only use your personal data for the purposes for which we collected it, unless we reasonably consider that we need to use it for another reason and that reason is compatible with the original purpose. If you wish to get an explanation as to how the processing for the new purpose is compatible with the original purpose, please contact us [email protected].   

If we need to use your personal data for an unrelated purpose, we will notify you and we will explain the legal basis which allows us to do so. 
Please note that we may process your personal data without your knowledge or consent, in compliance with the above rules, where this is required or permitted by law. 

5. Disclosures of your personal data

We may share your personal data with the parties referred to below for the purposes set out in the table Purposes for which we will use your personal data, above. 

  • External Third Parties as set out in the Glossary.

We require all third parties to respect the security of your personal data and to treat it in accordance with the law. We do not allow our third-party service providers to use your personal data for their own purposes and only permit them to process your personal data for specified purposes and in accordance with our instructions.

6. International transfers

We share your personal data within the PLA. This may involve transferring your data outside the European Economic Area.   Whenever we transfer your personal data out of the EEA, we ensure a similar degree of protection is afforded to it by ensuring at least one of the following safeguards is implemented:  

We will only transfer your personal data to countries that have been deemed to provide an adequate level of protection for personal data by the European Commission. 

7. Data security

We have put in place appropriate security measures to prevent your personal data from being accidentally lost, used or accessed in an unauthorised way, altered or disclosed. In addition, we limit access to your personal data to those employees, agents, contractors and other third parties who have a business need to know. They will only process your personal data on our instructions and they are subject to a duty of confidentiality.  

We have put in place procedures to deal with any suspected personal data breach and will notify you and any applicable regulator of a breach where we are legally required to do so. 

8. Data retention

How long will you use my personal data for? 

We will only retain your personal data for as long as reasonably necessary to fulfil the purposes we collected it for, including for the purposes of satisfying any legal, regulatory, tax, accounting or reporting requirements. We may retain your personal data for a longer period in the event of a complaint or if we reasonably believe there is a prospect of litigation in respect to our relationship with you, or directly or indirectly concerning you. 

To determine the appropriate retention period for personal data, we consider the amount, nature and sensitivity of the personal data, the potential risk of harm from unauthorised use or disclosure of your personal data, the purposes for which we process your personal data and whether we can achieve those purposes through other means, and the applicable legal, regulatory, tax, accounting or other requirements. 

In some circumstances you can ask us to delete your data: see your legal rights below for further information. 

In some circumstances we will anonymise your personal data (so that it can no longer be associated with you) for research or statistical purposes, in which case we may use this information indefinitely without further notice to you.  

9. Your legal rights

Under certain circumstances, you have rights under data protection laws in relation to your personal data. 

In particular, all individuals who are the subject of personal data held by the PLA are entitled to: 

  • Ask what information the PLA holds about them and why;
  • Ask how to gain access to it;
  • Be informed how to keep it up to date;
  • Other specific rights conferred under data protection legislation

If you wish to exercise any of your rights, please contact us as above. 

No fee usually required 

You will not have to pay a fee to access your personal data (or to exercise any of the other rights). However, we may charge a reasonable fee if your request is clearly unfounded, repetitive or excessive. Alternatively, we could refuse to comply with your request in these circumstances. 

What we may need from you 

We may need to request specific information from you to help us confirm your identity and ensure your right to access your personal data (or to exercise any of your other rights). This is a security measure to ensure that personal data is not disclosed to any person who has no right to receive it. We may also contact you to ask you for further information in relation to your request to speed up our response. 

Time limit to respond 

We try to respond to all legitimate requests within one month. Occasionally it could take us longer than a month if your request is particularly complex or you have made a number of requests. In this case, we will notify you and keep you updated.  

10. Glossary

LAWFUL BASIS 

Legitimate Interest means the interest of our business in conducting and managing our business to enable us to give you the best service/product and the best and most secure experience. We make sure we consider and balance any potential impact on you (both positive and negative) and your rights before we process your personal data for our legitimate interests. We do not use your personal data for activities where our interests are overridden by the impact on you (unless we have your consent or are otherwise required or permitted to by law). You can obtain further information about how we assess our legitimate interests against any potential impact on you in respect of specific activities by contacting us. 

Performance of Agreement means processing your data where it is necessary for the performance of a agreement to which you are a party or to take steps at your request before entering into such an agreement. 

Comply with a legal obligation means processing your personal data where it is necessary for compliance with a legal obligation that we are subject to.  For example, in order to comply with the NHS Test and Trace procedure introduced as a result of COVID-19. 

THIRD PARTIES 

External Third Parties 

  • Service providers acting as processors internationally who provide IT including data storage and system administration services.
  • Professional advisers acting as processors including lawyers, bankers, auditors, brokers and insurers based in the UK who provide consultancy, banking, legal, insurance and accounting services.
  • HM Revenue & Customs, regulators and other authorities acting as processors or joint controllers based in the United Kingdom who require reporting of processing activities in certain circumstances.

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS 

You have the right to: 

Request access to your personal data (commonly known as a "data subject access request"). This enables you to receive a copy of the personal data we hold about you and to check that we are lawfully processing it. 

Request correction of the personal data that we hold about you. This enables you to have any incomplete or inaccurate data we hold about you corrected, though we may need to verify the accuracy of the new data you provide to us. 

Request erasure of your personal data. This enables you to ask us to delete or remove personal data where there is no good reason for us continuing to process it. You also have the right to ask us to delete or remove your personal data where you have successfully exercised your right to object to processing (see below), where we may have processed your information unlawfully or where we are required to erase your personal data to comply with local law. Note, however, that we may not always be able to comply with your request of erasure for specific legal reasons which will be notified to you, if applicable, at the time of your request.  

Object to processing of your personal data where we are relying on a legitimate interest (or those of a third party) and there is something about your particular situation which makes you want to object to processing on this ground as you feel it impacts on your fundamental rights and freedoms. You also have the right to object where we are processing your personal data for direct marketing purposes. In some cases, we may demonstrate that we have compelling legitimate grounds to process your information which override your rights and freedoms. 

Request restriction of processing of your personal data. This enables you to ask us to suspend the processing of your personal data in the following scenarios:  

  • If you want us to establish the data's accuracy. 
  • Where our use of the data is unlawful but you do not want us to erase it.
  • Where you need us to hold the data even if we no longer require it as you need it to establish, exercise or defend legal claims.
  • You have objected to our use of your data but we need to verify whether we have overriding legitimate grounds to use it.

Request the transfer of your personal data to you or to a third party. We will provide to you, or a third party you have chosen, your personal data in a structured, commonly used, machine-readable format. Note that this right only applies to automated information which you initially provided consent for us to use or where we used the information to perform a contract with you.  

Withdraw consent at any time where we are relying on consent to process your personal data. However, this will not affect the lawfulness of any processing carried out before you withdraw your consent. If you withdraw your consent, we may not be able to provide certain products or services to you. We will advise you if this is the case at the time you withdraw your consent. 

Port security policy

We are the statutory harbour authority for the Port of London and have been designated a “strategic authority” in respect of the requirements of the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code.

January 2024
PDF Download

As the statutory harbour authority, licensing authority, owner and conservator of the tidal Thames riverbed, the Port of London Authority (PLA) has also been designated a “strategic authority” by the UK Government in respect of the requirements of the International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code. This role includes responsibilities in respect of security matters in the wider port environment and impacts directly on the PLA’s internal security culture and arrangements.

Under the umbrella of relevant ISPS legislation, the PLA will:

  • Develop and maintain an appropriate PLA Port Security Plan, which meets the requirements of the ISPS Code; and co-ordinate, communicate and facilitate the implementation of security measures required by the Plan to the port community, as appropriate;
  • Ensure the effective management and resourcing of internal security arrangements in order to meet the requirements of the PLA Port Security Plan; and
  • Contribute to the maintenance of an effective port security regime as a leading member of, and provide the secretariat function for, the Thames Port Security Authority (PSA).

Through the Thames PSA we will:

  • Provide up to date advice, best practice and information on current security developments, and on the implementation of the PSA Port Security Plan and Port Facility Security Plans, to the port community; and
  • Contribute effectively to security training and testing of the PSA Port Security Plan. 

In the wider context of the PLA’s commitment to, and co-operation on, marine security matters in the region, we will:

  • contribute effectively, as required and as circumstances permit, to the relevant regional Police Portal Groups, providing information, support and resources to the groups as appropriate;
  • work closely with the Metropolitan, Kent and Essex Police forces to ensure an effective security regime across all harbour districts; and
  • contribute effectively, as required and as circumstances permit, to the co-ordination and improvement of national initiatives to enhance regional maritime security and deter, prevent and compromise maritime terrorist action.

This Policy was approved by the PLA Executive Committee in January 2024.

Robin Mortimer
Chief Executive

Publications

Environment & sustainability policy

As managers of the tidal Thames our mission is to conserve and improve the river alongside its use as a thriving port and waterway. We are committed to sustainable development

January 2025
PDF Download

As the statutory harbour authority, licensing authority and owner of the bed of the tidal Thames, the Port of London Authority (PLA) is committed to fostering the sustainable development and management of the estuary in accordance with the Government's Marine Policy Statement, environmental duties under the Harbours Act 1964, and the principles outlined in the Port Marine Safety Code and its associated Guide to Good Practice. 

We will strive to maintain the highest standards of marine safety and environmental stewardship while minimising our environmental impact and deliver the PLA's contributions to the Thames Vision 2050, encompassing the Trading Thames, Destination Thames, and Natural Thames pillars. In pursuit of our mission to maintain the Thames as the UK's number one port, we will proactively comply with environmental legislation, prevent pollution and drive continuous improvements in our operations, which in turn ensures a sustainable and thriving river ecosystem for current and future generations by: 

• Achieving Net Zero by 2040: Commit to achieving net zero emissions for our operations by 2040 through proactive measures that reduce air emissions, decrease energy consumption, enhance energy efficiency, increase our reliance on renewable energy sources, improve waste management and sequester carbon in our landholdings. 

• Implement Climate Adaptation Strategies: Develop and implement comprehensive climate adaptation strategies to enhance resilience against climate change impacts, regularly assess risks, and integrate adaptive measures into our operations.

• Enhance Biodiversity: Manage the PLA estate to ensure that biodiversity is maintained or improved where possible. 

• Sustainable Procurement Practices: Pursue efficiencies that reduce the PLA’s environmental impact by adopting sustainable procurement practices. 

• Prevent pollution: Proactively implement and maintain effective pollution prevention measures throughout operations to minimize environmental impact and ensure a high level of preparedness for potential incidents, taking prompt action when necessary, and collaborating closely with stakeholders

The Port of London Authority (PLA) is committed to taking collaborative action with stakeholders across the port sector to create cleaner air, build Climate Resilience, improve water quality and increase biodiversity. 

The PLA will communicate this environmental policy to all staff, contractors, suppliers and stakeholders. Provide guidance and appropriate training where necessary, and report on our environmental and sustainability performance frequently. In maintaining an Environmental Management System (EMS) under 14001:2015, we will continually improve, assess the impacts of our activities on the environment and monitor and audit their effectiveness. This policy was approved by the PLA Executive Committee in January 2025. 

Chief Executive 

Robin Mortimer

Publications

PLA investment plan

Launched in May 2018, the plan has the twin objectives of accelerating delivery of Thames Vision goals and diversifying our income streams

PDF Download

Introduction

The Thames is the busiest waterway in the UK, home to the country’s second biggest port, a centre for sporting activity and a magnet for visitors and local people alike.

At the PLA it is our role as Custodians of the tidal Thames to support the drive to increase use of the river. The potential to embed the river in the life of the capital, and wider region, is reflected in the Thames Vision, the framework for developing river use over the next 20 years.  Developed through extensive collaboration across Thames stakeholders, the Vision is now well established, and integrated into the Mayor’s London Plan, transport and environment strategies.

Our twin objectives for this investment plan are to accelerate delivery of Thames Vision goals and diversify the PLA’s income streams.  The investment plan is not going to deliver the Vision alone, but will move the Vision forward, where judicious investments will support the growth in river use and deliver a wide range of public benefits. Diversifying income streams will make the PLA more financially resilient, in the face of variations in port trade, and so better able to sustain our services into the future.  

Investments are likely to be focussed on riparian land acquisitions, long term river infrastructure development, environmental improvements, and public benefit projects supporting greater river use in all its forms. Through the development of partnerships we will look to leverage in funding from the private and public sectors. 

This investment plan is part of our overall strategy to Protect, Improve and Promote.  Targeted investment will contribute to all three of these goals.

Our approach is consistent with Department for Transport guidance, the Ports, Good Governance Guidance.  The Guide sets out Trust Ports ability to make longer term investments that take into account the public benefit that will derive from them.  Our investment priorities will be shaped by the Thames Vision.  

Our ultimate goal is to pass on this great waterway to future generations in an improved condition – improved in terms of its economic vitality, its environmental condition and in the culture and life on, and alongside the river.  The investment plan will help accelerate delivery of this future Vision.

This document sets out our investment plan, reflecting the business context within which we operate, the balance of investment types we plan to adopt and governance arrangements.  We are open to further views on the plan and discussions around investment opportunities.

Robin Mortimer, Chief Executive

Investment strategy

All investments will have a clear link to the PLA strategy to Protect, Improve and Promote; they will also be judged on the degree to which they enable the delivery of the ambitions set out in the Thames Vision. 

The Strategy targets three broad categories of investment, with income varying, according to the assessed level of project risk, and the category of investment. 

The three investment categories are:

  • Category 1 – commercial investments, supporting river/port use, generating commercial rates of return 
  • Category 2 – long term investments with a long payback period, which also deliver public benefits 
  • Category 3 – public benefit investments, with no financial return expected 

Recognising that the PLA must remain a profitable entity which generates funds for future investments, the majority of our investments are expected to be in categories 1, and 2. 

In addition to these external investments, we will maintain our normal capital expenditure (capex) programme, to replace and improve operational assets, including vessels, navigational safety infrastructure and buildings.    

Examples of previous investments

  • Category 1 – Clubbs jetty – £500,000 – supported establishment of dedicated aggregate shipping operation into West London 
  • Category 2 –acquiring Peruvian Wharf for port operations – £6 million – supports modal shift of cargo from road to river
  • Category 3 –development of first Air Quality Strategy of any UK port – £100,000 – drives a programme of work to improve air quality on the Thames 

Investment Criteria

The key criteria for assessing proposals are that any investment must benefit the tidal Thames, align with the PLA Strategy and the Thames Vision, to satisfy at least one of the following: 

  • Generate more trade and more jobs or secure existing economic activities on the river
  • Generate more inland freight on the river
  • Increase the number of passengers using the river
  • Generate more sport and recreation safely carried out on the river
  • Improve the environment and the habitat of the river or immediately adjoining PLA riparian land
  • Increase community and cultural use of the river 

Assessments of potential projects will consider how, or whether, they might influence competitive market activity on the river.  This will be undertaken respecting any necessary commercial confidentiality, particularly during the negotiation phase of any project.  

In appraising project proposals, we will operate within a risk framework agreed by the PLA Board. In practical terms, projects will be developed by PLA senior executives, working with third party investment partners, and scrutinised by an Investment Committee comprised primarily of non-executive directors, whose remit will be to make recommendations to the PLA Board. 

As would be expected, all projects will undergo rigorous scrutiny to examine any construction, operational and financial risks, with external professional input sought as required.  Projects will need to deliver financial and/or public benefit returns commensurate with the level of risk.

Projects that expose the PLA or its investment partners to undue risks will not be taken forward.

We will publicise any investments made, or contracts entered into, in an appropriately open and transparent way for a publicly accountable Trust Port, whilst respecting any commercial confidentialities.

Proposals for Investment

We are open to approaches from potential partners for investments that meet the criteria set out in this document.  These should be taken to the PLA Chief Financial Officer, Steven Lockwood ([email protected]) in the first instance.  

PLA financial model

The PLA is a self-financing statutory authority.  In simple terms, we raise sufficient income through our activities to enable us to carry out our statutory duties and meet the cost of historic liabilities.  

As a not-for-dividend organisation, any financial surpluses are re-invested to benefit both the river and the communities we serve.
We consult on our charges and aim to keep annual increases at an affordable level that maintains the competitiveness of the port and river economy.

This requires us to operate our business efficiently, bearing down on costs, particularly as we are investing in our pilotage capacity, responding to continued growth in demand. 

With around two thirds of our income related to the number of ship calls and cargo on board the vessels, changes in port trade can have a material impact on our financial performance.  Investing for commercial return in river related assets and projects not dependent on port trade volume will add diverse income streams.  This will protect against that volatility in trade, ensuring we maintain a solid financial position.  

We intend to make the PLA’s cash balance work harder to support delivery of the Thames Vision and for the benefit of the organisation, whilst retaining a prudent level of reserves. 

About the tidal Thames

The tidal Thames is 95 miles of river from Teddington Lock, through central London, out to the North Sea.  This stretch of river is home to the UK’s second biggest port, busiest inland waterway for freight and passengers and a growing centre for sporting activity.  

Economically, the port plays a key role as part of supply chains serving the UK markets of London, the south east and beyond. Over 40,000 jobs depend on the port which generate over £4 billion in economic value added annually. In addition, there are over 100,000 jobs related to the river as an amenity, and economic activity generating value added of over £2 billion.

Publications

Emissions and performance of alternative diesel fuels on PLA Harbour Service Vessel - Kew

PDF Download

1. Executive Summary

The report presents results of the trial and exhaust gas sampling and measurement from PLA Harbour Service Vessel, Kew, operating on Ultra-Low-Sulphur Diesel (ULSD), Gas-To-Liquid (GTL) and Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO) fuel.

  • Exhaust gas monitoring demonstrated a reduction in nitrogen oxides and particulate matter emissions when operating with GTL and HVO relative to ULSD at all engine speeds. A reduction of carbon dioxide emissions during operation with GTL, however, that might be resulted from a lower fuel flow rates and reduced engine work out for a given sampling speed.

  • The trials of GTL and HVO indicated no significant increase in fuel consumption rate relative to ULSD and caused no damage to the engine. A reduction in soot deposition on the piston crowns, valves and injector nozzles was also observed. No additional servicing was required during the trials of GTL and HVO relative to ULSD.

  • The use of HVO can reduce the greenhouse gas emissions associated with an organisation’s activities as the carbon dioxide emitted during combustion is deemed to have been offset by the absorption of carbon dioxide during growth of the biomass that forms the biofuel.

Table 1 Abbreviations
Air Quality StrategyAQS
Carbon DioxideCO2
Carbon Dioxide EquivalentCO2e
Carbon MonoxideCO
Gas-To-LiquidGTL
Greenhouse GasesGHGs
Horsepowerhp
Hydrotreated Vegetable OilHVO
Particulate MatterPM
Polycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPAH
Nautical mileNm
Nitrogen OxidesNOx
Revolutions per minutermp
Sulphur DioxideSO2
Total HydrocarbonTHC
Ultra-Low-Sulphur DieselULSD

List of Figures

Figure 1 Harbour Service vessel, Kew.

Figure 2 Horiba 9100 Mexa analyser at the laboratory of University College London.

Figure 3 Schematic of the sampling assembly. Image credit: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London.

Figure 4 Exhaust gas concentrations of CO2 (% vol/vol) from the starboard engine at 5 speed conditions operated on Diesel, GTL, and HVO.

Figure 5 Exhaust gas concentrations of NOx (ppm) from the starboard engine at 5 speed conditions operated on Diesel, GTL, and HVO.

Figure 6 Exhaust gas concentrations of PM (mg/L) from the starboard engine at 5 speed conditions operated on Diesel, GTL, and HVO.

Figure 7 Exhaust gas concentrations of THC (ppm) from the starboard engine at 5 speed conditions operated on Diesel, GTL, and HVO.

Figure 8 Exhaust gas concentrations of CO (%) from the starboard engine at 5 speed conditions operated on Diesel, GTL, and HVO.

List of Tables

Table 1 Abbreviations

Table 2 Typical Annual Operation Profile

Table 3 Selected fuel properties from fuel data sheets.

Table 4 The average fuel consumption rate, L/NM, with ULSD, GTL and HVO fuels by Kew.

Table 5 Estimated annual emissions of NOx, PM, and THC.

Table 6 Estimated annual emissions of scope 1 CO2e and “outside of scope” CO2 from the PLA’s Harbour Service vessel.

2. Background

Figure 1 Harbour Service vessel, Kew.
Figure 1 Harbour Service vessel, Kew.

Air pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter (PM), are emitted from the combustion of fuels and can have short- and long-term impacts on people’s health and ecology. The updated Air Quality Strategy for the Tidal Thames (AQS) in 2020, which reflect the changes in policies, regulations, such as the Clean Air Strategy, and Clean Maritime Plan, and progress, has set out reduction targets relative to the 2016 baseline for NOx and PM are 20% by 2026, 40% by 2031, 50% by 2041, and 77 & 78% by 2051 at a port level.

Adopting alternative diesel fuels, defined here as fuels that are functionally equivalent to diesel fuel and are able to substitute diesel fuel without infrastructure or engine changes, with reduced air emissions is one way to achieve short-term air quality targets and as a transitional solution to reduce the carbon footprint before zero emission technologies reach maturity.

3. Introduction

Alternative diesel fuels have been widely used at a commercial scale in road transport, but there is still relatively limited operational experience with their use in vessel engines to allow the PLA to make an informed decision on which alternative fuel to switch to. Therefore, the PLA had undertaken trials on Gas-To-Liquid (GTL) and Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO) on one of the Harbour Service vessels, Kew (see Section 3.1 for details), to better understand the environmental benefits relative to Ultra-Low-Sulphur Diesel (ULSD) and to identify if there are any unintended consequences.

To evaluate the air emissions reduction in a maritime setting, the PLA had commissioned University College London to compare the pollutant concentration within the exhaust gas during the operation with neat ULSD, neat GTL, and neat HVO (see Section 3.2-3.5 for the brief description of the fuels). A post-trial engine inspection was also carried out by the PLA’s engineers to ensure there are no unintended consequences to the state of the engines.

A use case that based on the average annual usage of the Kew and the fuel consumption rate of each fuels was also established to appraise the potential air and greenhouse gas emissions saving of the alternative diesel fuels.

3.1 Vessel Specifications & Profile

The PLA’s Harbour Service vessel, Kew, is 13.5 m long, 4.8 m wide with a weight of 11 tonnes and has two Tier II marine diesel engines, John Deere 6068TFM75 6.8 Litre Straight 6 marinesed engines producing 201 hp at 2600 rpm. They are keel cooled and have dry exhausts and each engine has an independent fuel tank. The fuel system for each engine has a Racor 30 micron external fuel filter followed by the engines 30 micron primary fuel filter. This is finally followed by an oil and water separator.

Kew is used in the middle and lower districts of the tidal Thames, between Putney Bridge and the North Sea, to provide regular patrol. The vessel can achieve top speeds of around 20 knots. The typical annual operational profile is as listed in Table 2.

Table 2 Typical Annual Operation Profile
Annual Distance Travelled2,1110 Nm
Average Vessel Speed10 knots

 

3.2 Ultra-Low-Sulphur Diesel (ULSD)

Sulphur is a naturally occurring component of crude oil, including diesel, and sulphur dioxide (SO2) or sulphur particulate matter are emitted when the fuels are burned. The Ultra-Low-Sulphur Diesel (ULSD) is a diesel fuel that has been refined so that its sulphur content is 15 part per million (ppm, equivalent to mg/kg) or less.1 The European Fuel Quality Directive (2009/30/EC) stated as of 1st January 2011, all gas oil for use in all non-road mobile machinery, including inland waterway vessels, must contain no more than 10 ppm of sulphur.2 To be compliant with the legislation, Kew had been running on ULSD before the start of the trials of alternative diesel fuel.

The lower amount of sulphur in diesel fuel can reduce the emissions of SO2 and sulphur particulate matter. However, the emissions of other air pollutants, such as NOx and other aromatic particulate matter, cannot be reduced without any other post-combustion abatement interventions, such as selective catalytic reduction (SCR) or diesel particulate filter (DPF).

3.3 Gas-To-Liquid (GTL)

The GTL fuel is a synthetic oil derived from natural gas, a type of fossil energy source, but have distinctly different characteristics than the traditional diesel fuel. The GTL fuel has a paraffinic nature, high cetane number, low amounts of total aromatic and sulphur content compared to traditional diesel fuel (Table 3), which have the potential to reduce the emissions of PM. The higher cetane number also leads towards improved combustion that might result in lower carbon monoxide (CO) and Total Hydrocarbon (THC) emissions.3,4

It is colourless, odourless, non-toxic, and biodegradable that it can be packaged, transported, and stored using the same equipment, materials, and procedures as conventional diesel. It also exhibits the flexibility to use as a direct fuel or in blends with fossil fuel which allows seamless introduction without major engine modifications or a new engine or refuelling infrastructure. Due to the potential of lower emissions compared to traditional diesel fuel, it is regarded as a clean alternative fuel.

3.4 Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO)

Hydrotreated Vegetable Oils (HVO), a type of biofuel and commonly referred to as renewable diesel, is produced from vegetable and/or animal oils and fats through hydro processing.5 The feedstock for HVO is flexible, allowing the use of a wide range of low quality waste and residue materials, such as food waste and oil removed from wastewater sewers (also known as brown grease), for fuel production. HVO produced from waste is considered to have zero-life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions up to the process of collection of the materials can typically save 88% of the life cycle GHG emission1 relative to diesel fuel.2 The HVO fuel produced from vegetable oil, such as rapeseed, sunflower, and palm oil, can have a typical life cycle greenhouse gas emission savings between 40%-68% relative to diesel fuel2 due to the capture of carbon dioxide during the growth of the plant. However, the other key additional feedstock needed for HVO production is hydrogen, which today comes mainly from a fossil source.5

The HVO fuel has similar fuel properties as the GTL fuel (Table 3) that it also has the potential of reducing the emissions of PM, CO, and THC. Some HVO fuels on the market contain an additive system, which aids to reduce the emissions of air pollutants chemically and cleaner combustion.6 Among other components, the additive package includes a detergent that could potentially cleans the fuel system, valves and injectors.

The HVO fuel also exhibits the flexibility to use as a drop-in replacement for traditional diesel fuel that it can be used without needing engine and infrastructure modifications. The unsaturation and contaminants were removed during production that it is has better storage stability5 and relatively long shelf life.7

3.5 Blend with Diesel Fuel

The alternative diesel fuel trials on Kew did not include blended fuels, however, it is possible to blend in any desired ratio of GTL or HVO into diesel fuels without compromising fuel quality and engine modification.8 Fuel Quality Directive 2009/30/EC (recital 33) states that limit for the content of biodiesel is not required for diesel-like hydrocarbon biofuels and HVO.

Laboratory and land-based studies shown the GTL-diesel or GTL-biodiesel-diesel mixture resulted in a decrease in CO, PM, THC, and SO2 emissions compared to that for diesel.9,10,11 The results for NOx emissions from the blended fuel were inconsistent. In general, except for NOx, the reduction in emissions increases with the increase in percentage of GTL or biodiesel, however, it is uncertain that the improvement is correlated linearly with the content of the alternative fuel or not.

For the HVO-diesel blend, some studies shown the HVO blend resulted in CO, PM, and THC reduction compared to that for diesel,12,13 however, some studies shown the HVO blends did not lead to any reduction in regulated emissions.14

Table 3 Selected fuel properties from fuel data sheets
 ULSDGTLHVO70% Diesel* + 30% HVO15
Cetane number53707065
Density at 15 ˚C, kg/m3831.1765-800770820
Viscosity at 40 ˚C, mm2/s2.7212-4.52-43.4
Total aromatics content, % (m/m)3.1**1.11.01 **
Sulphur content, mg/kg6.855 
Distillation 95 % recovered at X ˚C, ˚C353.8***360320355
Distillation Y % recovered at 250 ˚C, %36< 65< 65N/A
Distillation Y % recovered at 350 ˚C, %95.28585N/A

* Diesel = European EN 590:2004 diesel fuel

** Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) only

*** 96%

 

4. Methodology

The alternative fuel trials and exhaust gas monitoring were undertaken by one of the PLA’s Harbour Service vessels, Kew.

 Figure 2 Horiba 9100 Mexa analyser at the laboratory of University College London
 Figure 2 Horiba 9100 Mexa analyser at the laboratory of University College London

4.1 Exhaust Monitoring

The exhaust gas monitoring methodology, samples collection, and analysis were carried by the Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London.

The engine exhaust emissions samples were collected from Kew that operating on ULSD, GTL, and HVO during a dedicated sampling cruise that embarked and disembarked from Royal Terrance Pier, Gravesend. The starboard engine was sampled from while operating initially on ULSD and following two periods of fuel switchover to GTL then HVO for serval months between each fuel type. No changes in the engine calibrations were made with the switch of fuels. The starboard engine was sampled at an engine idle condition at 800 rpm, and while providing vessel thrust at 1000 rpm, 1200 rpm, 1500 rpm and 2500 rpm.

The collected exhaust samples were subsequently taken to the university’s laboratory for quantitative analysis. The concentration of air pollutants and greenhouse gases, such as NOx, CO, CO2, and THC, within the exhaust gas was analysed by a Horiba 9100 Mexa analyser (Figure 2), and the amount of PM was determined gravimetrically following desiccation. Noting that the CO2 measured within the exhaust are emitted through the combustion of fuel.

The schematic of the sampling assembly is as shown in Figure 3, where a vacuum pump was used to extract gases from the main engine exhaust via a stainless-steel pipe to fill the 10 L Tedlar sample bags and force flow through the 1.0 micrometre pore size filters for collection of the particulates.

Figure 3 Schematic of the sampling assembly. Image credit: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London
Figure 3 Schematic of the sampling assembly. Image credit: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London

4.2 Engine Performance

The tested engine was lifted out of the vessel and returned to the PLA’s engineering workshop for internal examination after both trials were completed. The engine head was removed so that the cylinder bores, piston crowns, inlet and exhaust valves and injector nozzles could be inspected.

The reported average fuel consumption rate for each fuel type was the average of 29-31 days fuel consumption and mileage recorded by Reygar, Marine Performance Monitoring System.

4.3 Use Case – Annual Air & Greenhouse Gas Emissions

The annual air and greenhouse gas emissions saving were estimated using the average annual operational profile of Kew, the average fuel consumption rate, and emission/conversion factors.

The air pollutant emissions of ULSD are estimated with emission factors from the National Emission Inventory for Motorboat. The emission factors, contrasting the exhaust emissions, are used to quantify the amount of emissions from fuel consumed in an activity, and that is the annual distance travel by Kew in this use case. As there are no air pollutant emission factors for Motorboat that operations with GTL or HVO are available, the emissions from GTL and HVO are estimated based on the observed percentage reduction relative to ULSD in the exhaust gas samples at an engine speed of 1500 rpm.

The estimations of greenhouse gas emissions are based on the annual fuel consumption and the relevant emission factor from the UK government conversion factors,16 which are updated annually. The values shown in this report are based on the 2020 values. The UK government conversion factor spreadsheet does not contain a value for GTL, and therefore, the calculation for GTL is not included.

Fuel consumed in an activity by an organisation is classified as a Scope 1 greenhouse gas emission2 and is reported as the equivalent greenhouse gases (CO2e) expressed in terms of the global warming potential of CO2. For biofuels the conversion factor is significantly lower than for fossil fuels as the carbon dioxide element of the total greenhouse gases is zero to account for the CO2 absorbed by bioenergy sources during growth. This is the factor reported in an organisation’s carbon footprint. In addition to this, to be transparent about all potential sources of CO2 from its activities, the organisation must report “outside of scope” values which account for the impact of CO2 released during combustion.

 

5. Exhaust Emissions Results

5.1 Exhaust Concentration of CO2

The levels of CO2 in the exhaust gas samples, representing the CO2 emitted through combustion, during operation with GTL are consistently appreciably lower than that with ULSD, and HVO at engine speeds above 800 rpm. The emissions of CO2 from the pipeline are positively correlated with the amount of fuel burnt, and therefore, the results suggest the fuel flow rates were lower and thus engine load produced during the operation with GTL in compare to with ULSD or HVO despite the equivalent engine speed.

The comparable CO2 emissions during operation with HVO and ULSD at all engine speed suggest similar levels of work produced. The range of CO2 emissions reduction from the combustion of HVO relative to ULSD found in this study also in agreement with the CO2 conversion factors used by the UK government,16 with biofuel conversion factors including an “outside of scopes” CO2 relating to the CO2 emitted during combustion that is deemed to be offset by the growth of the biofuel feedstock. The CO2 conversion factors at the point of combustion is 2.74 kg of CO2 /L for diesel and 2.36 kg of CO2 /L for biofuel.16

Figure 4 Exhaust gas concentrations of CO2 (% vol/vol) from the starboard engine at 5 speed conditions operated on Diesel, GTL, and HVO
Figure 4 Exhaust gas concentrations of CO2 (% vol/vol) from the starboard engine at 5 speed conditions operated on Diesel, GTL, and HVO

5.2 Exhaust Concentration of NOx

In general, the levels of NOx emitted increase with increasing engine speed, especially apparent during operation with ULSD and HVO. A lower NOx concentration during combustion of GTL and HVO relative to ULSD at all engine speeds were observed. The emission of NOx increases rapidly with increasing in-cylinder temperature. A higher engine load is likely to have increased in-cylinder temperature, yet, the total level of NOx produced will have been tempered by the shorter duration at these higher temperatures per combustion cycle with the increase in engine speeds.

In the case of the GTL fuel, this is likely primarily attributable to the lower levels of engine work produced during operation with GTL, as mentioned in Section 5.1. The lower level of fuel burnt resulting in lower in-cylinder temperatures, which reduced the production of NOx. Other experimental studies9 have found a decrease in NOx emissions with GTL compared to those from diesel fuel running, attributable to the higher cetane number of GTL fuel and subsequently a shorter ignition delay. However, the magnitude of the reduction depends on engine load and fuel injection conditions.

For HVO, the emissions of NOx were generally found to be reduced relative to diesel by other combustion studies under laboratory and vehicle testing conditions.17 Nevertheless, the magnitude of reduction is significantly sensitivity to fuel injection timing and other engine operating conditions.

Figure 5 Exhaust gas concentrations of NOx (ppm) from the starboard engine at 5 speed conditions operated on Diesel, GTL, and HVO.
Figure 5 Exhaust gas concentrations of NOx (ppm) from the starboard engine at 5 speed conditions operated on Diesel, GTL, and HVO.

5.3 Exhaust Concentration of PM

The emissions of PM were significantly lower at all engine speeds during operation with GTL and HVO relative to ULSD. The rate of particulate formation during combustion can be increased by the presence of aromatic molecules within the fuel, as these are the precursors to the formation of initial soot particles. The total aromatics content was not stated for the ULSD; however, the level of PAH is higher than the total aromatics content of the GTL and HVO fuels.

The formation and emission of particulates are also sensitive to the fuel air ratio during combustion, with leaner mixtures reducing soot formation and increasing rates of oxidation. In the case of GTL, the significantly lower PM emissions may in part be attributable to the suggested lower fuel flow at a given engine speed. For HVO, there is no apparent suggestion of a lower engine load relative to ULSD and the reduction likely attributable to the fuel chemical properties.

Figure 6 Exhaust gas concentrations of PM (mg/L) from the starboard engine at 5 speed conditions operated on Diesel, GTL, and HVO.
Figure 6 Exhaust gas concentrations of PM (mg/L) from the starboard engine at 5 speed conditions operated on Diesel, GTL, and HVO.

5.4 Exhaust Concentration of THC

The emissions of THC arise due to incomplete fuel combustion, arising from either insufficient temperatures or levels of oxygen. The increasing engines speeds can be expected to reduce the occurrence of both, with higher levels of energy release and reduced time available for fuel over-dilution.

In general, the emissions of THC decrease with increasing engine speed when operation with ULSD or GTL, and lower THC emissions at a given speed in the case of operation with GTL or HVO relative to that with ULSD. The significantly higher cetane number of the GTL and HVO fuel relative to ULSD would likely have reduced the duration of fuel ignition delay following the start of injection and decreased the time available for fuel over-dilution prior to the start of combination that reduces the production of THC relative to ULSD. Notwithstanding the cetane number is the same for HVO and GTL, the influence of engine speed in THC emissions in operation with HVO were not clear.

Figure 7 Exhaust gas concentrations of THC (ppm) from the starboard engine at 5 speed conditions operated on Diesel, GTL, and HVO.
Figure 7 Exhaust gas concentrations of THC (ppm) from the starboard engine at 5 speed conditions operated on Diesel, GTL, and HVO.

5.5 Exhaust Concentration of CO

Similar to the formation of THC, emissions of carbon monoxide (CO) arise due to incomplete combustion of fuel carbon, and so might be expected to reduce with increase engine speeds.

The levels of CO emitted show a general decrease with increasing engine speed when operating with ULSD or GTL fuel. The lower levels of CO emitted in the case of operation with GTL relative to ULSD and HVO at all engine speeds greater than 800 rpm is consistent with the suggestion in Section 5.1 that the fuel flow rates, and engine loads were lower during operation with GTL.

In contrast to ULSD and GTL, the highest levels of exhaust CO during operation with HVO were found at the highest engine speed of 2500 rpm. The higher levels of CO observed with HVO are in agreement with the lower emissions of NOx as shown in Section 5.2, which both indicate the lower in-cylinder temperatures in the case of HVO combustion.

Figure 8 Exhaust gas concentrations of CO (%) from the starboard engine at 5 speed conditions operated on Diesel, GTL, and HVO.
Figure 8 Exhaust gas concentrations of CO (%) from the starboard engine at 5 speed conditions operated on Diesel, GTL, and HVO.

5.6 Uncertainties in the Exhaust Monitoring

The exhaust samples were collected on dedicated sampling cruise with the same route but on different day and time. The effects of tide and weather conditions were not considered for the exhaust sampling analysis, which might affect the engine load and fuel consumption, and hence, the emissions.

6. Engine Performance Results

During the trial of GTL and HVO, there were no physical or visible issues caused during operation. This included no blockages and no signs of fuel breakdown. The post-trials inspection, after the trial of both alternative diesel fuels, identified the following:

1. The presence of intact cross hatching on the cylinder walls, indicating no significant wear and no signs of cylinder glazing, which would impact on lubrication leading the cylinder or piston ring wear.

2. The piston crowns were found to be fully intact with a light coating of soot that was easily wiped off, which is an improvement on the harder to remove soot particles build up that would normally be found when running ULSD.

3. Neither the fuel makes up or the injectors ability to handle it have resulted in any damage to the piston crowns, suggesting a spray pattern comparable to burning ULSD is still being formed.

4. There are no signs of damage due to early or late combustion which is positive as the increase in cetane value should cause slightly premature combustion. The timing of the engine has not been changed to accommodate alternative fuels.

5. There is a light build-up of soot particles on the valves and injector nozzles and this was easily wiped off. This is an improvement on the harder to remove soot build up that would normally be found when running ULSD.

The average fuel consumption rate, which averaged from between 29 to 31 days of fuel consumption, with ULSD, GTL, and HVO fuels are shown in Table 4. The trials have not demonstrated a significant difference in the fuel consumption rate between fuels.

Table 4 The average fuel consumption rate, L/NM, with ULSD, GTL and HVO fuels by Kew
FuelULSDGTLHVO
Consumption rate, L/ Nm2.943.172.99

 

7. Use Case Result

7.1 Annual Air Pollutant Emissions

The estimated annual emissions of NOx, PM, and THC is shown in Table 5. The emissions of PM are significantly lower with the use of alternative fuels. The emissions of NOx are almost halved for GTL and almost a third for HVO.

Table 5 Estimated annual emissions of NOx, PM, and THC
Annual Emissions \ Fuel TypeULSDGTLHVO
NOx, kg24321240827
PM, kg2361914
THC, kg28457111850

 

7.2 Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions

The scope 1 CO2e and the “outside of scope” CO2 emissions are listed in Table 6. The scope 1 CO2e is significantly lower with the use of HVO relative to ULSD due the uptake of CO2 during the growth of the plant or organic waste being used as feedstock. No CO2e or CO2 values were calculated for GTL as there is no conversion factor available. However, as mentioned in the Introduction that the feedstock of GTL is natural gas, a type of fossil fuel.

Table 6 Estimated annual emissions of scope 1 CO2e and “outside of scope” CO2 from the PLA’s Harbour Service vessel
Annual Emissions \ Fuel TypeULSDGTLHVO

Carbon Footprint

Scope 1 CO2e, tonne*

172 (of which 170 is CO2)N/A10
Reported separately “outside of scopes” CO2, tonne N/A149

 

Summary

Exhaust gas samples were collected from one of the PLA’s Harbour Service vessels, Kew, operating on neat ULSD, neat GTL, and neat HVO under various engine speeds. The concentration of air pollutants and greenhouse gas, including NOx, PM, THC, and CO2, within the exhaust gas samples were then analysed at an independent laboratory.

• CO2 emitted during the combustion of GTL were 12-49% lower compare to ULSD. However, reduced level of CO2 during the operation with GTL are suggestive of lower fuel flow rates and reduced engine work out for a given engine sampling speed. For HVO, the CO2 reduction was 7-44% at engine speed at/lower than 1500 rpm and a 1% increase at the highest tested engine speed at 2500 rpm.

• NOx emissions reduced with the use of GTL and HVO fuels relative to ULSD. HVO recorded 51-78% reduction while GTL recorded 39-56% reduction in NOx. However, evidence suggested that the reduced NOx formation with GTL might be attributed to the reduced rate of fuel delivery, which subsequent resultant lower in-cylinder temperatures for a given engine speed.

• PM emissions reduced significantly with the use of GTL and HVO fuels relative to ULSD. HVO recorded 76-99% reduction while GTL recorded 50-93 % reduction in PM. The reductions are attributable to the paraffinic nature and reduced aromatic content of both fuels.

• CO and THC emissions were both lower with the use of GTL fuels relative to ULSD. However, the emissions of CO and THC were generally higher with the use of HVO relative to GTL, and some conditions ULSD, suggesting a greater degree of incomplete combustion due to fuel over-dilution or insufficient temperatures.

The vessel engine was also lifted out and had a full inspected after the trials by the PLA’s engineers.

• No physical or visible operational issues, including no blockages and no signs of fuel breakdown, were experienced during the trials.

• No additional servicing, which carried for every 400 hours of operation, was required during the trials of GTL and HVO relative to ULSD.

• The post-trials engine inspection identified no significant wear and no signs of cylinder glazing, no signs of damage due to changing of combustion timing related to the higher cetane number, and reduced soot deposition on the piston crowns, valves and injector nozzles.

• The fuel consumption rate with ULSD, GTL, and HVO fuels were found not to be significantly different during the trial.

The greenhouse gas emissions associated with an organisation’s activities based on the average annual usage and UK government conversion factor were estimated

• The scope 1 equivalent greenhouse gases (CO2e) emissions were significantly lower with the use of HVO compare to ULSD as the carbon dioxide emitted during combustion is deemed to have been offset by the absorption of carbon dioxide during growth of the biomass that forms the biofuel.

• No comparison was made against GTL as there is no conversion factor available for GTL.

References

1 European Commission, “Alternative Fuels for Marine and Inland Waterways; An exploratory Study (Report EUR 27770 EN),” European Union, EUR, 2016.

2 European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009, Directive 2009/30/EC, Special edition in Croatian: Chapter 13 Volume 055 P. 187 - 212, Current consolidated version: 10/06/2016.

3 M. Oguma, S. Goto, K. Oyama, K. Sugiyama and i. M. Mor, “The Possibility of Gas to Liquid (GTL) as a Fuel of Direct Injection Diesel Engine.,” SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-1706, 2002.

4 M. Lapuerta, O. Armas, J. Hernández and A. Tsolakis, “Potential for reducing emissions in a diesel engine by fuelling with conventional biodiesel and Fischer–Tropsch diesel.,” fUEL, vol. 89, pp. 3106-13, 2010.

5 European Alternative Fuel Observatory, “Hydrotreated Vegetable Oils (HVO),” European Alternative Fuel Observatory, [Online]. Available: https://eafo.eu/alternative-fuels/advanced-biofuels/hvo. [Accessed 3 2021].

6 New Era, “GreenD+ HVO,” New Era, [Online]. Available: https://newerafuels.co.uk/green-d-hvo/. [Accessed 3 2021].

7 Crown Oil, “HVO Fuel (Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil Fuel),” Crown Oil, [Online]. Available at this link. [Accessed 3 2021].

8 Y. Huang, S. Wang and L. Zhou, “Effects of Fischer-Tropsch diesel fuel on combusion and emissions of direct injection diesel engine,” Frontier of Energy and Power Engineering in China, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 261-267, 2008.

9 H. Sajjad et al., “Engine combustion, performance and emission characteristics of gas to liquid (GTL) fuels and its blends with diesel and bio-diesel,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014.

10 M. Gunfeel, Y. Lee, K. Choi and D. Jeong, “Emission characteristics of diesel, gas to liquid, and biodiesel-blended fuels in a diesel engine for passenger cars,” Fuel, vol. 89, no. 12, pp. 3840-3846, 2010.

11 M. Bassiony, A. Ibrahim and M. El-Kassaby, “An experimental study on the effect of using gas-to-liquid (GTL) fuel on diesel engine performance and emissions,” Alexandria Engineeering Journal, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 2115-2124, 2016.

12 L. Rantanen, R. Linnaila, P. Aakko and T. Harju, “NExBTL - Biodiesel Fuel of the Second Generation,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-3771, 2005.

13 D. Athanasios, N. Ioannis, D. Athanasios, K. Dimitrios, S. Zissis, B. Stella and L. Kalle, “Evaluation of a Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO) and Effects on Emissions of a Passenger Car Diesel Engine,” Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering , vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 2297-3079, 2018.

14 R. Suarez-Bertoa, M. Kousoulidou, M. Clairotte, B. Giechaskiel, J. Nuottimäki, T. Sarjovaara and L. Lonzaa, “Impact of HVO blends on modern diesel passenger cars emissions during real world operation,” Fuel, vol. 235, pp. 1427 - 1435, 2019.

15 Neste Oil, “Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO) - premium renewable biofuel for diesel engines,” Neste Oil Proprietary publication, 2014.

16 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, “Government conversion factors for company reporting of greenhouse gas emissions,” Gov.uk, 2021 6 2020. [Online]. Available at this link. [Accessed 3 2021].

17 S. Y. No, “Application of hydrotreated vegetable oil from triglyceride based biomass to CI engines - a review,” Fuel, vol. 115, pp. 88-96, 2014.

About the author

Dr Veronica HG Chan, Senior Advisor on Air Quality and Climate Change, BEng, MEng, PhD, Port of London Authority

Veronica joined the Port of London Authority as its senior advisor on air quality and climate change at the beginning of 2020. Prior to this, she had years of experience in Earth science research, mainly working on atmospheric chemistry and climate related studies.

Veronica leads work on the implementation of the PLA’s Air Quality Strategy for the tidal Thames to reduce the harmful emissions to air from marine sources within the tidal River Thames while facilitating the future growth of the port. She is also responsible for the organisation’s adaptation in response to climate change.

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Subscribe to

Essential information

Receive key updates

Subscribe Now
Back to top